Given what we already know about the unsavory behavior of British intelligence in the north of Ireland, (which is still part of the United Kingdom) where UK spooks allegedly colluded with para military criminals in committing a host of crimes up to and including murder. Could it be Mi5 were aware of the depths of criminality the Murdoch empire had sunk into, but failed to pass this on to their political ‘masters,’ as it suited their own agenda, as they like the Metropolitan police had formed far to close a working relationship with Murdoch’s criminal media outlets.
If so, with the Guardians unyielding and tenacious reporting of the whole hacking brouhaha, followed by Ed Miliband growing some balls, the UK secret intelligence service must now realise the worm has turned and whilst close links to criminal elements in the British media may have once been considered an A+, it is now regarded by the British public and an increasing number of politicians as a D-minus.
Can we expect any public inquiry into the hacking scandal to look into what the security services did or did not know about Murdock’s echelons hacking their way across London? After all if a British Prime Minister regularly went to the home of a friend who was accused in the Guardian of robbing banks, would the intelligence service not deem it fit and proper to warn him of the possible consequences? Did they inform David Cameron it would be unwise to spend part of his Christmas holiday at the home of Rebekah Brooks chief executive of News International, let alone tell the whole world he regarded her as a friend?
After all what is the point of having a secret service if it cannot warn the Prime Minister about the shady company he keeps, or protect a former PM from criminal snoopers who prey on his family.
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
Good point
12.07.2011 19:36
The reality is that this was a joint MI5/News International surveillance network. They were keeping an eye on politicians and celebrities to ensure they did not step out of line. And if they did, they'd find themselves on the NoW front page. This does include celebrities because they'd get very annoying if they got a conscience that MI5 did not sponsor.
And why hack 7/7 victims and Afghan soldiers' families? Because they'd need to find out if they were to attack the Government narrative on these issues and take action. NoW wouldn't necessarily have done that. MI5 would.
SDubois
Go on the blues!
12.07.2011 23:11
If only Labour had the guts to do that when they were in power!
Daphne from Eggheads.
Security Checks
14.07.2011 22:36
Border Guard
PFI database state
16.07.2011 12:13
The other point is the crossover between the state and private corporate interests.
A lot of money is in PFI/PPP contracts including the same firms working in health, housing, workfare and 'defence'. The same few companies have been involved in building ( often unsuccessfully having rinsed billions of public money - but then still getting new contracts e.g Capita, Fujitsu etc.) large state database systems which essentially put everybodies details in private corporate hands.
There is a revolving door of consultants in Westminster from PWC, Deloitte, KPMG both imposing poverty and then claiming to advise on poverty reduction, not to mention all the shits with the IMF and Brussels trousering it.
Lots of people can exercise power of you within the database state, hacking is not always necessary:- e.g.the Labour council blacklists, staff selling private details etc etc.
Still newspapers seem to have little to do with reporting news whether its the Sun or the Guardian.
digital tech