A number of protesters then went onto the A59 despite being told not to and were arrested. The main march then returned back to the front gates.
6 people have been arrested in total, and are all still being held at Harrogate police station.
Skip Navigation | Sheffield IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us
Stephen | 04.07.2007 17:23 | Sheffield
Stephen
04.07.2007 19:51
Section 12 notice under the Public Order Act 1986
Protestor
04.07.2007 20:24
Stephen
07.07.2007 01:25
2%Human
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza
2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival
April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006
Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
was permission for demo asked for
04.07.2007 21:48
or not? interested in how they've applied law
Grounds for restrictions?
05.07.2007 16:28
What interests me is that in order to impose those the senior officer had to reasonably believe that there would be disorder etc as quoted in the notice. The least he had to believe is that we would cause "serious disruption to the community". By any standards - size and peaceable nature of demo, previous history of no trouble, place miles from anywhere etc - such a belief was completely unreasonable. I wonder if there is any way the order can be disputed? Is it too late to be worth it?
Vincent Wood
Health and Safety
07.07.2007 01:01
I was there and the senior officer seemed to be stressing the safety of his officers and the protestors
on the busy A59 as the reasons for stopping the procession.
It would seem from the links below that Section 12 is for expected "serious" disorder etc.
Closing the A59 for 30 mins while the procession processed would hardly be "serious" disruption.
So it would seem that the police were less inclined to facilitate our right to protest
and more inclined to keep traffic flowing on the A59.
From
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/animal-rights-extremism-270401?view=Binary
"Section 12 Public Order Act 1986: Imposing conditions on public processions.
Identification of organisers may be difficult in giving written notice prior to
procession. Some forces distribute leaflets and post signs at the scene of a protest
procession.
· In relation to imposing conditions on a procession, which is sporadic in nature, the
imposition is by the senior officer at the scene. This is by rank and length of
service. Forces must ensure that the senior officer present at the scene can be
identified at all times. The other issue re this power is that the senior officer must
believe that disorder, damage, disruption or intimidation will occur. If the
precious (sic) processions have been without incident, this may pose problems."
Other Links
http://www.geocities.com/animalconcern2001/legal10.htm
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/04/309720.html?c=on
http://cynatech.co.uk/gwi/docs/generic_legal.pdf
2%Human