On Friday 20/4/13, Scotland's largest producer of surface mined coal, Scottish Coal went into liquidation. LAON's press release suggests that reasons other than those which have dominated news items about this event, lie behind this collapse. This press release aims at putting the record strait. In so doing, it raises questions as to whether large scale opencast mining operations, under present circumstanace will ever be profitable in Scotland again.
THE LOOSE ANTI OPENCAST NETWORK
LAON PR 2013 – 25 23/4/13
SCOTTISH COAL’s COLLAPSE: THE UNTOLD STORY
The collapse of the Scottish Coal Company has, according to those charged with liquidating the business, been caused by the following:
“Scottish Coal has been suffering from well published difficulties. A combination of falling prices, rising operational costs (particularly fuel) and a number of Scottish Coal sites exhausting their reserves has contributed to trading losses and significant cash flow pressures. Despite significant efforts in recent months, the company was unable to secure the level of investment required to enable the business to continue”
Analysis undertaken by the Loose Anti Opencast Network can throw further light onto the reasons that have led to the demise of the Scottish Coal Company Ltd (SCCL)
Firstly, all of the Scottish Surface Mine industry faces the prospect of an increase in rail freight charges from 2016 that would significantly increase the cost of transporting coal from Scotland to England. Starting from 2016, over a three year period, the cost will rise from £2.83 a tonne to £4.04 per tonne. Last year the Office of the Rail Regulator conducted a consultation exercise over its proposal to increase its freight charges. In reply, SCCL indicated that it would be especially hard hit if these charges were introduced and that it would lead to the:
“Closure of all Scottish coal mines supplying the power generation market in England...”
This would according to the same letter reduce the demand for its coal by 50%
Secondly, Scottish Coal was sending so much of its coal to England because its quality was too poor to service the Scottish market. In the same letter, Scottish Coal explains:
“SCCL currently has the potential to provide coal which could generate about a third of Scotland’s electricity needs, however owing to the lower environmental emission limits at Scottish power stations, coal is being transported to England where the coal quality is fully compliant for coal fired electricity generation. As a result, rail transport is even more important to the electricity supply than it would be if Scottish coal was being transported the shorter distances into Scottish power stations.”
However, when Scottish Coal wrote this letter, it knew that this English market for its coal was about to disappear as these more polluting power stations, Didcot, Kingsnorth, Ferrybridge (part), and Ironbridge were about to close because they did not meet the requirements of the Large Combustion Plant Directive. The implication was that by the end of 2015, this decline in capacity to burn the quality of coal Scottish Coal was producing, along with the closure of the Cockenzie power station near Edinburgh for the same reason, would have had a severe impact on Scottish Coal’s operations.
Thirdly, given this degree of uncertainty over the future market for its coal, the cost of transporting this coal plus the looming problem of possibly being forced to begin the costly process of having to restore a number of opencast sites who’s coal reserves had been exhausted, it is no wonder that financiers would not advance further monies to the Scottish Coal Company. In some quarters, some of these problems were well known, with at least two news articles highlighting the implications especially that the increased rail freight charges could decimate the industry:
‘MP says rail freight charges will threaten local jobs’ (Carrick Gazette, 25/1/13) @
http://www.carricktoday.co.uk/news/local-headlines/mp-says-rail-freight-charges-will-threaten-local-jobs-1-2753462
‘New cost ‘will lead to more coal lorries’ (Scottish Herald, 18/2/13) @
http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/transport/new-cost-will-lead-to-more-coal-lorries.20242993?_=c17ece1ef4818595d96d145b0b62751779d67f63
Steve Leary, for the Loose Anti Opencast Network, a UK wide organisation which supports local groups campaigning against inappropriate opencast mine applications, said
“If this analysis of the broader set of issues facing SCCL is correct, then it suggests that the same set of issues face other Scottish surface mining firms. In addition to SCCL going into liquidation, ATH Resources has also recently gone into receivership. These longer term issues highlighted here raise longer term questions over the economic viability of the industry. It has already left a legacy of a number of derelict opencast sites across the central belt of Scotland, many of them the responsibility of the activities of SCCL in the past.
If opencast mining is to continue in Scotland, we would like to see the economic viability of each application more vigorously tested than it is now, plus the provision of a fully funded Restoration Bond ‘up front’ before any work on any new site starts to prevent new eyesores from being created.”
END END END END
NOTE: Part of this press release is based on research undertaken for LAON entitled “The Rail Regulator, Scottish Freight Charges and the expected effect of an increase in Freight Charges, on the Scottish Coal Industry.” If anyone would like a free copy of this research please email
infoatlaon@yahoo.com
INFORMATION ABOUT LAON
The Loose Anti-Opencast Network (LAON) has been in existence since 2009. It functions as a medium through which to oppose open cast mine applications and works with groups where local people feel that such a development is inappropriate.
CONTACTING LAON
Steve Leary, LAON’S Co-ordinator, at infoatlaon@yahoo.com
You can now follow LAON on twitter @ http://twitter.com/seftonchase
GROUPS IN THE LOOSE ANTI OPENCAST NETWORK:
Coal Action Network Whittonstall Action Group, Northumberland, North Pennine Protection Group, Northumberland, Pont Valley Network, Co Durham, Pittington Residents Group Co Durham, Newton Lane Action Group, Leeds, Residents Against Birklands, Gatshead Cowley Residents Group, Sheffield , Skelmansthorpe Action Group, Kirklees Shortwood Farm Opencast Opposition, Nottinghamshire, West Hallum Environment Group, Derbyshire, Smalley Action Group, Derbyshire, Hilltop Action Group, Derbyshire, , Minorca Opencast Protest Group, Leicestershire, Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast, Staffordshire, Stop Opencast at Sharlston, Wakefield Alumwell Action Group. Walsall Just Say No to Lignite, N Ireland, Coal Action Scotland Saline Parish Hub, Fife Green Valleys Alliance, Rhymney Valley Merthyr Tydfil Anti Opencast Campaign, Merthyr Tydfil Llwdgoed Action, Merthyr Tydfil and Varteg Protest, Torfaen
LAON PR 2013 – 25 23/4/13
SCOTTISH COAL’s COLLAPSE: THE UNTOLD STORY
The collapse of the Scottish Coal Company has, according to those charged with liquidating the business, been caused by the following:
“Scottish Coal has been suffering from well published difficulties. A combination of falling prices, rising operational costs (particularly fuel) and a number of Scottish Coal sites exhausting their reserves has contributed to trading losses and significant cash flow pressures. Despite significant efforts in recent months, the company was unable to secure the level of investment required to enable the business to continue”
Analysis undertaken by the Loose Anti Opencast Network can throw further light onto the reasons that have led to the demise of the Scottish Coal Company Ltd (SCCL)
Firstly, all of the Scottish Surface Mine industry faces the prospect of an increase in rail freight charges from 2016 that would significantly increase the cost of transporting coal from Scotland to England. Starting from 2016, over a three year period, the cost will rise from £2.83 a tonne to £4.04 per tonne. Last year the Office of the Rail Regulator conducted a consultation exercise over its proposal to increase its freight charges. In reply, SCCL indicated that it would be especially hard hit if these charges were introduced and that it would lead to the:
“Closure of all Scottish coal mines supplying the power generation market in England...”
This would according to the same letter reduce the demand for its coal by 50%
Secondly, Scottish Coal was sending so much of its coal to England because its quality was too poor to service the Scottish market. In the same letter, Scottish Coal explains:
“SCCL currently has the potential to provide coal which could generate about a third of Scotland’s electricity needs, however owing to the lower environmental emission limits at Scottish power stations, coal is being transported to England where the coal quality is fully compliant for coal fired electricity generation. As a result, rail transport is even more important to the electricity supply than it would be if Scottish coal was being transported the shorter distances into Scottish power stations.”
However, when Scottish Coal wrote this letter, it knew that this English market for its coal was about to disappear as these more polluting power stations, Didcot, Kingsnorth, Ferrybridge (part), and Ironbridge were about to close because they did not meet the requirements of the Large Combustion Plant Directive. The implication was that by the end of 2015, this decline in capacity to burn the quality of coal Scottish Coal was producing, along with the closure of the Cockenzie power station near Edinburgh for the same reason, would have had a severe impact on Scottish Coal’s operations.
Thirdly, given this degree of uncertainty over the future market for its coal, the cost of transporting this coal plus the looming problem of possibly being forced to begin the costly process of having to restore a number of opencast sites who’s coal reserves had been exhausted, it is no wonder that financiers would not advance further monies to the Scottish Coal Company. In some quarters, some of these problems were well known, with at least two news articles highlighting the implications especially that the increased rail freight charges could decimate the industry:
‘MP says rail freight charges will threaten local jobs’ (Carrick Gazette, 25/1/13) @
http://www.carricktoday.co.uk/news/local-headlines/mp-says-rail-freight-charges-will-threaten-local-jobs-1-2753462 ‘New cost ‘will lead to more coal lorries’ (Scottish Herald, 18/2/13) @
http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/transport/new-cost-will-lead-to-more-coal-lorries.20242993?_=c17ece1ef4818595d96d145b0b62751779d67f63 Steve Leary, for the Loose Anti Opencast Network, a UK wide organisation which supports local groups campaigning against inappropriate opencast mine applications, said
“If this analysis of the broader set of issues facing SCCL is correct, then it suggests that the same set of issues face other Scottish surface mining firms. In addition to SCCL going into liquidation, ATH Resources has also recently gone into receivership. These longer term issues highlighted here raise longer term questions over the economic viability of the industry. It has already left a legacy of a number of derelict opencast sites across the central belt of Scotland, many of them the responsibility of the activities of SCCL in the past.
If opencast mining is to continue in Scotland, we would like to see the economic viability of each application more vigorously tested than it is now, plus the provision of a fully funded Restoration Bond ‘up front’ before any work on any new site starts to prevent new eyesores from being created.”
END END END END
NOTE: Part of this press release is based on research undertaken for LAON entitled “The Rail Regulator, Scottish Freight Charges and the expected effect of an increase in Freight Charges, on the Scottish Coal Industry.” If anyone would like a free copy of this research please email
infoatlaon@yahoo.com INFORMATION ABOUT LAON
The Loose Anti-Opencast Network (LAON) has been in existence since 2009. It functions as a medium through which to oppose open cast mine applications and works with groups where local people feel that such a development is inappropriate.
CONTACTING LAON
Steve Leary, LAON’S Co-ordinator, at
infoatlaon@yahoo.com You can now follow LAON on twitter @
http://twitter.com/seftonchase GROUPS IN THE LOOSE ANTI OPENCAST NETWORK:
Coal Action Network Whittonstall Action Group, Northumberland, North Pennine Protection Group, Northumberland, Pont Valley Network, Co Durham, Pittington Residents Group Co Durham, Newton Lane Action Group, Leeds, Residents Against Birklands, Gatshead Cowley Residents Group, Sheffield , Skelmansthorpe Action Group, Kirklees Shortwood Farm Opencast Opposition, Nottinghamshire, West Hallum Environment Group, Derbyshire, Smalley Action Group, Derbyshire, Hilltop Action Group, Derbyshire, , Minorca Opencast Protest Group, Leicestershire, Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast, Staffordshire, Stop Opencast at Sharlston, Wakefield Alumwell Action Group. Walsall Just Say No to Lignite, N Ireland, Coal Action Scotland Saline Parish Hub, Fife Green Valleys Alliance, Rhymney Valley Merthyr Tydfil Anti Opencast Campaign, Merthyr Tydfil Llwdgoed Action, Merthyr Tydfil and Varteg Protest, Torfaen
e-mail:
Comments
Hide the following comment
Against Reform
24.04.2013 09:50
Coal Action Scotland, and the communities it works with have never supported the continuation of open cast coal mining in Scotland*. We aim and actively work towards seeing open casting stopped by way of directly opposing any applications that are submitted for new coal mines - resorting to use Direct Action if necessary. As for current mines we aim to see that all present work is stopped and that full restoration work is carried out immediately.
I feel that It should also be noted that the 'economic viability' of an open cast only serves to run the pockets of the company bosses and land owners who allow for, and operate the mines. As for the communities they experience economic devastation - areas where open cast mining is happening in Scotland are also home to some of the countries most impoverished communities. Unsurprisingly these communities also experience extremely poor health, directly connected to open casting, with cancer rates often 40% higher than the Scottish national average.
As such, myself, and others whom I work with, do not believe in the possibility of nor do we support or are we working towards the reform of the fossil fuel industry. The only thing we wish to see is its demise.
*or in England and Wales or in the rest of the world for that matter.
n/a