Skip Navigation | Sheffield IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

UK Indymedia UK Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia

Government Orders You Tube To Censor Protest Videos

Paul Joseph Watson | 13.06.2011 23:31 | Repression | Technology | Sheffield | World

In a frightening example of how the state is tightening its grip around the
free Internet, it has emerged that You Tube is complying with thousands of
requests from governments to censor and remove videos that show protests and
other examples of citizens simply asserting their rights, while also
deleting search terms by government mandate.



The latest example is You Tube’s compliance with a request from the British
government to censor footage of the [1]British Constitution Group’s Lawful
Rebellion protest, during which they attempted to civilly arrest Judge
Michael Peake at Birkenhead county court.

Peake was ruling on a case involving Roger Hayes, former member of UKIP, who
has refused to pay council tax, both as a protest against the government’s
treasonous activities in sacrificing Britain to globalist interests and as a
result of Hayes clearly proving that council tax is illegal.

Hayes has [2]embarked on an effort to legally prove that the enforced
collection of council tax by government is unlawful because no contract has
been agreed between the individual and the state. His argument is based on
the sound legal principle that just like the council, Hayes can represent
himself as a third party in court and that “Roger Hayes” is a corporation
and must be treated as one in the eyes of the law.

The British government doesn’t want this kind of information going viral in
the public domain because it is scared stiff of a repeat of the infamous
poll tax riots of 1990, a massive tax revolt in the UK that forced the
Thatcher government to scrap the poll tax altogether because of mass civil
disobedience and refusal to pay.

When viewers in the UK [3]attempt to watch videos of the protest, they are
met with the message, “This content is not available in your country due to
a government removal request.”

We then [4]click through to learn that, “YouTube occasionally receives
requests from governments around the world to remove content from our site,
and as a result, YouTube may block specific content in order to comply with
local laws in certain countries.”

You can also [5]search by country to discover that Google, the owner of You
Tube, has complied with the majority of requests from governments,
particularly in the United States and the UK, not only to remove You Tube
videos, but also specific web search terms and thousands of “data
requests,” meaning demands for information that would reveal the true
identity of a You Tube user. Google claims that the information sent to
governments is “needed for legitimate criminal investigations,” but whether
these “data requests” have been backed up by warrants is not divulged by the
company.

“Between July 1 and Dec. 31 (2009), Google received 3,580 requests for user
data from U.S. government agencies, slightly less than the 3,663 originating
from Brazil,” [6]reports PC World. “The United Kingdom and India sent more
than 1,000 requests each, and smaller numbers originated from various other
countries.”

With regard to search terms, one struggles to understand how a specific
combination of words in a Google search can be considered a violation of any
law. This is about government and Google working hand in hand to manipulate
search results in order to censor inconvenient information, something which
[7]Google now freely admits to doing.

You Tube’s behavior is more despicable than the Communist Chinese, who are
at least open about their censorship policies, whereas You Tube hides behind
a blanket excuse and doesn’t even say what law has been broken.

Anyone who swallows the explanation that the videos were censored in this
case because the government was justifiably enforcing a law that says scenes
from inside a court room cannot be filmed is beyond naive. Court was not
even in session in the protest footage that was removed, and the judge had
already left the courtroom.

The real reason for the removal is the fact that the British government is
obviously petrified of seeing a group of focused and educated citizens,
black, white, old and young, male and female, go head to head with the
corrupt system on its own stomping ground.

In their efforts to keep a lid on the growing populist fury that has arrived
in response to rampant and growing financial and political tyranny in every
sector of society, governments in the west are now mimicking Communist
Chinese-style Internet censorship policies in a bid to neutralize protest
movements, while hypocritically lecturing the rest of the world on
maintaining web freedom.

Via a combination of cybersecurity legislation and policy that is hastily
introduced with no real oversight, governments and large Internet
corporations are crafting an environment where the state can simply demand
information be removed on a whim with total disregard for freedom of speech
protections.

This was underscored last year at the height of the Wikileaks issue, when
Amazon axed Wikileaks from its servers [8]following a phone call made by
Senator Joe Lieberman’s Senate Homeland Security Committee demanding the
website be deleted.

Lieberman has been at the forefront of a push to purge the Internet of all
dissent by empowering Obama with a figurative Internet kill switch that he
would use to shut down parts of the Internet or terminate websites under the
guise of national security. Lieberman spilled the beans on the true reason
for the move [9]during a CNN interview when he stated “Right now China, the
government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need
to have that here too.”

Except that China doesn’t disconnect the Internet “in case of war,” it only
ever does so to censor and intimidate people who express dissent against
government atrocities or corruption, [10]as we have documented. This is
precisely the kind of online environment the British and American
governments are trying to replicate as they attempt to put a stranglehold on
the last bastion of true free speech – the world wide web.


References

1.  http://www.prisonplanet.com/british-tax-protesters-arrest-judge-in-act-of-lawful-rebellion.html
2.  http://www.ukcolumn.org/articles/cat-out-bag
3.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esGqizRDo6w&feature=player_embedded
4.  http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=1099103
5.  http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests/
6.  http://www.pcworld.com/article/194651/google_youtube_received_10000_government_requests_for_user_data.html
7.  http://www.precursorblog.com/content/google-now-admits-its-search-isnt-neutral
8.  http://www.prisonplanet.com/lieberman-has-power-to-shut-down-websites-with-a-phone-call.html
9.  http://www.prisonplanet.com/lieberman-china-can-shut-down-the-internet-why-cant-we.html
10.  http://www.prisonplanet.com/liebermans-model-for-america-purging-the-internet-of-dissent.html

Paul Joseph Watson
- Homepage: http://www.infowars.com/government-orders-you-tube-to-censor-protest-videos/print/

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

IP Shielding

13.06.2011 23:41

This is alarming, but for the time being at least it's easy to get round these blocks - download and use Hotspot Shield (IP shielding software) and You Tube then thinks your IP address is in America and you can watch this video no problem

IP Shielding


Actually

14.06.2011 02:43

i think the video got removed as it's against the law to film a court case.

Criminal Justice Act 1925 Section 41
 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/86/section/41

Peace


Load of tossers

14.06.2011 15:07

I just searched for 'British Constitution Group Lawful Rebellion' on Youtube and got loads of videos of the Birkenhead protest. So the above commenter is probably right. This lot are a load of whingers making themselves out to be persecuted martyrs. Think for yourselves, people!

Grumpy Old One


I'm unconvinced too

16.06.2011 22:27

It is against the law to film inside a courtroom whether the court is in session or not. They're lucky they weren't spotted. How did they manage to get a video camera into a court building anyway? Most of them have metal detectors and bag searches at the door.

pinkolady
- Homepage: www.owlsotherblog.blogspot.com


@ Pinklady

17.06.2011 02:25

That's not quite correct:

"Isn't it against the law to film in courts?

Yes. But only when those films identify people involved in current court cases. Since commercial filming takes place outside court sitting hours when the courts are empty it's quite legal to use them as locations."

 http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/court-venue-hire/faqs.htm#2

Peace


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Sheffield Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Sheffield [navigation.actions2016]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2015]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

Sheffield Actions 2013

G8 2013

Sheffield Actions 2012

Workfare

Sheffield Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

Sheffield Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Sheffield Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Sheffield Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Sheffield Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Sheffield Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Sheffield Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Sheffield Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Sheffield Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech