nuclear renaissance demo

Demonstrators attended the nuclear renaissance event to remind business men what they are really getting into.

It is poison and no new tech or fancy words can dispose of the waste or repair the damage caused by nuclear in all its forms.

nuclearindustryispoisonousgreedystupiddangerousandwrong

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

Nukelear power - No thanks

17.02.2011 22:36

OK....so - yet another Nuclear Renaissance event....was, it seems, attended by (Blissfully?) ignorant people in business suits?
But we need jobs....they say....
If we don't make nuclear(power) bombs - then someone else will...they say.
The western world is safe...because we have a nuclear deterrent - they say.

I say...talk of jobs, business suits and smirking at loony, soap-dodging lefties in white boiler suits will NOT prevent them....or anyone from nuclear fallout, radiation sickness, vomiting, loss of skin, son, daughter, etc....when all this is out.

Ohhhhh....THREADS!....Pah!....that was just a film!

Ohhhh. Chernobyl....! ...That was just Clumsy ruskies...damned commies...nothing to do with us!

Ohhhh.....Five mile island....etc, etc,

Ohhhh....cough, cough, splutter, splutter.....

Too late now.

Auntie War

More renewables ?

18.02.2011 17:17

Most people think that, the most important thing is to 'keep the lights on', and they live in fear of what they call 'the dark ages'. Possibly this was an age when the sky went dark at night rather than the reassuring yellow glow that we have become accustomed to. But the 'dark ages', not so long ago, were the natural state of night. If we want to change it, there are consequences for nature, how ever you try to power it.

The power of the wind is the cleanest of all energy, harnessed for thousands of years by millers and sailers, so I was shocked to read the article bellow:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

Windy miller

backwards thinking

18.02.2011 21:46

CO2 is good, more forests please and a wood economy.

Bawb

forwards thinking

18.02.2011 22:29

To: Bawb

I agree with your argument in spirit. However:

1. We, globally, are producing Co2 at a faster rate than trees can absorb it. So the Co2 ends up in the atmosphere where it acts as a greenhouse gas.

2. We, again globally, are deforesting the planet, so in the future there will be fewer trees to absorb the Co2 than no, hence more Co2 in the atmosphere.

As things are, more Co2 does not mean more trees, it means more greenhouse effect, and more damaging climate change.

me @ you

20.02.2011 15:02

more forests, please!

bawb

leaf the trees alone

20.02.2011 20:37

more trees please indeed and protection for the forests that they plan to dump nuclear waste under, there are certain councils eagerly anticipating back handers to do so boo!

woody

Kollektives

Sheffield Topics

Sheffield Actions 2006

Sheffield Actions 2003

Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

nuclear renaissance demo

Comments

Nukelear power - No thanks

What's wrong with nuclear power?

More renewables ?

backwards thinking

forwards thinking

me @ you

leaf the trees alone

Kollektives

Sheffield Topics

Sheffield [navigation.actions2016]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2015]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2014]

Sheffield Actions 2013

Sheffield Actions 2012

Sheffield Actions 2011

Sheffield Actions 2010

Sheffield Actions 2009

Sheffield Actions 2008

Sheffield Actions 2007

Sheffield Actions 2006

Sheffield Actions 2005

Sheffield Actions 2004

Sheffield Actions 2003

Encrypted Page

IMCs