Skip Navigation | Sheffield IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

UK Indymedia UK Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia

Bone Idle: or Work Doesn’t Work!

underclassrising.net | 15.08.2010 13:56 | Sheffield



An Interview with Ian Bone and Ray Roughler Jones from anarchistmedia.wordpress.com has kindly stuck the interview myself and Ray Roughler Jones did for the current issue of ’The Idler’ We nicked it from here  http://anarchistmedia.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/bone-idle-or-work-doesnt-work-an-interview-with-ian-bone-and-ray-roughler-jones/



The following conversation between Tom Hodgkinson (The Idler), Ian Bone (of Class War fame) and Ray Roughler-Jones (Roughler TV) took place in December 2009 and appears in issue 43 of The Idler: Back to the Land.

WHEN IT COMES to being a professional idler, I have to take my hat off to those two grand masters of anti-capitalist slack, Ian Bone and Ray Roughler-Jones. Bone is best known for Class War, his provocative, aggressive, radical paper. I also read Bone’s excellent biography, Bash the Rich, an account of a working class bohemian life. Being working class for Bone is not about slaving in the factories, but about pursuing a life of intellectual curiosity, pleasure and freedom; in a sense, not working. Ray Roughler-Jones is Bone’s old friend who I remember from my days working at Rough Trade shop in Portobello Road in 1990. Ray edits the Roughler magazine and puts on all sorts of events in the W11 area, often working with the actress Anna Chancellor, who starred in Four Weddings and a Funeral. Another project is the Youtube channel Roughler TV. He has been on the dole for about forty years. Bone is publishing Ray’s autobiography, Drowning on Dry Land, on his indie publishing label, Bone Books. Another release on Bone Books is Hartmann the Anarchist: The Doom of the Great City, a story first published in 1892 and written by a seventeen year old public schoolboy called E. Douglas Fawcett.

Anyway, I arranged to meet up these two outstanding beacons of the idling classes in Mike’s Café in Portobello Road. “Blimey, this has smartened up a bit, hasn’t it?” commented Bone when he walked in. Bone is well-dressed in a Fedora and a nice wool overcoat.

TH: Now most people think of anarchy as violent and aggressive. But to me it is all about voluntary action and independence. I have been talking [with Warren Draper] about an anarchy movement—called “Anglarchy”—that is rooted in English literature, Blake and Cobbett, very practical, and not about smashing up the bus stops. Although there may be a place for that. What’s your idea of liberty, anarchy, freedom?

IB: Pretty much the same as yours: a world without work, a world of unlicensed pleasure. I certainly don’t go for all that right-to-work bollocks. I see interviews with kids hanging around shopping centres and all they want to do is sit on the wall all day and talk to their mates, and someone with a microphone goes: “wouldn’t you rather have a job?” And they say, “yes, oh yeah, we’d rather have a job”, as a knee jerk. But that’s the last thing in the world they want.

TH: The recent marches and demonstrations in London: they were marching for jobs. They had banners saying, “we want jobs”. And there’s this thing called The People’s Charter, which says vaguely “we want more and better jobs”.

IB: That’s just bollocks. It’s mostly people on the Left who have this ethos, but the feckless working class doesn’t want “more and better jobs”. The Left has an image of the Jarrow Marches. My Grandad was an unemployed miner in Scotland in the thirties, at the same time as the Jarrow Marches. He was supposed to have had a job filling the pits in, but instead, there’s a great photo of him playing cards and dominos. The central question is, how do the working class become idlers, as opposed to those who can afford idleness, knowing others will provide their sewerage, drains, electricity, food, water and so on. There is a pivotal moment in Dave Douglass’s new book where he writes about the return to work after the miners’ strike where many miners deliberately sabotaged the pits in order to take redundancy payments. This unseen, unheroic working class struggle for freedom from work is seldom recognised or acknowledged, so idleness as a class issue is not taken up because the Left has a different agenda, with its Jarrow heroism.

TH: One of my enemy figures would be Tony Benn. He has this idea of full employment and the working classes riding off to the factory.

IB: In the Eighties the SWP organised the “right to work” marches. Everyone had their little SWP bibs on. The kids who went on it were promised discos every night, sex, and all they got was Trotsky’s Transitional Programme.

TH: Do you ever hear that thing where people on the hard Left accuse anarchists of being bourgeois?

IB: Fucking hypocrites — the SWP is entirely made up of people who used to be polytechnic lecturers wearing corduroy trousers… what’s their working class composition? Virtually nil, now. But I don’t really care about people’s background: it’s where you are now. What you can’t do is do both: be politically anarchist and retain all the privileges of the previous life. For example George Monbiot, who has done the classic thing: Monbiot is so keen on allotments that he has seven of his own. But it never occurs to him there might be six other people out there. Have you heard his thing, “the Land is Ours”? Yes, the land is yours: you fuckin’ own it, you cunt!

TH: Yes, but Simon Fairlie and The Land, though: that really is a good magazine.

IB: Oh yes, well I like all the anti-enclosures stuff, the history of English radicalism. The poaching wars. There were huge wars in the 18th century between poachers and gamekeepers, with huge gangs on either side.

TH: How have things changed since you two first came to London thirty or forty years ago?

RRJ: In Wales, signing on for us was a full-time job. The only people I knew who had jobs were people who were just about to have a court appearance. Nowadays, with the questions they ask you before you go on a medical, you can work out all the conditions to get on the sick… “bad back” used to be the only clincher… now with the Internet you can authoritatively claim to have the symptoms of Ebola virus and they’ll sort you out sharpish.

TH: And when did you both take against work?

RRJ: It’s just that nobody worked, none of our friends worked.

IB: No one ever worked… in Bash the Rich there’s a story about “turning to the working class” but we didn’t know anyone who was working! We were all on the dole so we started a Claimants’ Union, a union for people on the dole. We would fight to get you all your entitlements. The classic line was: “If they get you a job, we’ll fight your case!” There were all the jokes about what occupation you gave when you were signing on: Father Christmas, snow clearer. and so on. One job I gave was “Coronation Programme Seller”. “What’s that then, Mr Bone?” asked a puzzled clerk. “Very long hours. On the day, you’re up at five in the morning till all hours,” I countered — not mentioning I hadn’t had the luck of securing such a position since 1953!

TH: Is it actually responsible to be claiming dole from the State?

RRJ: Well, the less money they have to start wars.

TH: Is it easier now, or harder?

IB: It’s just as easy. My son was sent for a job in Cashbusters in Bristol. How was he going to get out of it? I said, well, first ask about unions. What sort of union is there? Then the clincher – ask about paternity leave.

TH: So you advise your son on how not to work?

IB: Like a duck to water. He just didn’t want to take a glorified debt collection job.

TH: Does the skiving thing go back for generations, do you think?

RRJ: It’s not exactly skiving. It’s hard graft to be on the dole. They never leave you alone… one time, we thought we’d better get a job. And we saw these dustmen in the pub in Swansea. They were always there at eleven in the morning. We thought we’d try that. We went down there. The interview was: “what’s your name? Right, start tomorrow.” So we went the next day. Fireball XL5 was the name of our wagon. We said to the bloke in charge, early finish is it? He said, oh yes, you’ll be finished by half past four. We said, what about the eleven o’clock finish? And he said, you’ve got to be here thirty years before you get that shift. I remember running away from the depot.

TH: So even the prospect of working till four thirty just for one day was too much?

IB: Yes — we’re fucking men of principle.

RRJ: It’s a tricky old life on the dole, because they don’t leave you alone and they don’t give you much money. So you spend the rest of the time trying to top up.

TH: Little businesses and things?

RRJ: Or whatever.

IB: The critical problem for me has always been that capitalism needs a reserve army of the unemployed. What about the people who want to be unemployed? All these people who are broken-hearted because they can’t get a job or are being made redundant… so you might as well have people who want to be unemployed.

TH: But capitalism wants the unemployed people who are desperate for a job, not the ones who enjoy being unemployed.

IB: Remember the four week rule in the seventies – if you were single and didn’t take a job in four weeks they’d stop your money. A fucking disgrace.

RRJ: It’s tricky at the moment.

TH: Are you on the dole?

RRJ: I’m on the sick.

TH: On the sick from what, though?

IB: Bad back…

TH: I have one friend who has declared himself mad.

RRJ: Then they leave you alone completely.

TH: Won’t you both be getting a pension soon?

IB: I’ve never paid enough subs to get a pension…. I was on the dole for years. And I had a job as a community worker. I used to go in and read the Guardian, make some phone calls and go on the Internet. I used to sit there reading the Annual Report for hours. I didn’t even look busy. You’re supposed to look busy. Most jobs you could do the work in about an hour, to be honest.

TH: So this is all about using your intellect to become master of your situation?

RRJ: The thing is, I’m always busy. I can’t stay in the flat after eight in the morning.

TH: I meet people who have taken control of their own lives and their work and been creative, and created an autonomous life, and I wonder, why is it that so few people do that? And it’s not actually a class issue.

RRJ: People are frightened.

IB: People have families so it ain’t such a good rate to be on the dole as when you’ve got no dependants… Even I had to work as a postie and a hospital porter for years when the kids were young.

TH: Well, I’ve been in a nuclear family for ten years, and it can be hard to keep the energy up to stay freelance. Sometimes you think, this is too much hard work. Life might be easier if I just had to turn up in an office. And what did you do when you first got to London, Ray?

RRJ: I didn’t have a clue what I was going to do when I got here. I got a flat… I had a girlfriend at college, and she did what exactly what she wanted to do. She was career-minded. Her father was a professor and she had the work ethic. I didn’t know what I was going to do. I went on the dole. And nothing much has changed since.

IB: Ray was an accomplished shop-lifter in Swansea so was able to supplement his income.

RRJ: I gave all that up.

IB: Most people go round nicking big lumps of cheese, joints of meat and big Nescafé jars and hawk ‘em round the pubs at lunchtime to get beer money.

TH: So you were exiled from Swansea, Ray?

RRJ: Yes. I nicked a suit with an alarm on, got chased by a security guard who got knocked down by a car but still got up and nabbed me. All the security guards used to say, ‘Morning Ray’.

TH: You had political beliefs behind this.

IB: I didn’t want to work either for the state, being an anarchist, or for some fucking capitalist company. I thought I’d never work officially, but I could do stints on the dole and survive on fuck all money with no possessions outside of a bin bag.

TH: It’s a gentlemanly existence, isn’t it?

RRJ: This is from my book: “On the third day, they’d got us working in the bowels of some huge silo thing… a falling brick fractures my arm and crushes two of my toes. I was lucky. Who said hard work never killed anyone? The twat.”

IB: A mate of ours, John, worked as a ticket collector at Ladbroke Grove station; stood as Class War candidate in the Kensington by-election in ‘87. He never checked any tickets because he would read Class War or The Sun all day. After a while his Underground bosses said, we’ve been watching you for four hours, and you haven’t checked one ticket. You’ve been reading a copy of Class War all day. He brought a successful case saying he had been harassed. And then successfully transferred to the sick for years claiming stress!

TH: Have you ever gone into a job and tried to rouse up the workers to rebellion against the bosses?

IB: Well, always. When I was in the Housing Association once, I eventually got the sack for breach of confidentiality.. There was some fiddling going on, and I told the local paper. They quoted me, an anonymous source, but then put my name in!

TH: I thought it would be a good piece for the Idler, to get a young man to take lots of crap jobs and, in a sense, just behave like a dignified human being and see how long you last. And say: “I’m ethically opposed to that. I can’t do it.”

IB: Cashbusters… they’re all working for debt collecting agencies, pawnbrokers, call centres, charity muggers – all jobs offering mind-numbing boredom and you don’t even get the collectivity of signing on any more – all done from your computer.

TH: My parents were in Fleet Street in the Seventies, and the workplace was something completely different then. Clattering typewriters, shouting, smoking. People worked together and it was fun. They went to the pub together. Now we are separated by the computer. Before Wapping, the unions had ensured that there were some good jobs.

IB: The printers or rather the Union Chapel ran the show and got their members on about a million quid a week… in the heyday of Red Robbo, fighting for jobs, the night shift at British Leyland used their engineering skills to build secret bedrooms on the factory floor where they could grab a crafty kip.

TH: If there was something they didn’t like in the paper, the Father of the Chapel would come upstairs and say: “the boys ain’t happy.” And they were very well paid.

IB: All those big industrial jobs went. We went to a meeting called by Arthur Scargill… one of the miner’s wives went through a litany of family deaths and illness from industrial diseases caused by working in the pits then said: “I’ll fight to keep the pits open for my children and my children’s children…” A lot of the miners didn’t want to go back. They were having a far better time on strike. They were meeting lots of women. They were going all over the country… they were having a great time. There was an argument to say: “Fuck the pits. We ain’t going back underground.” After they went back a lot of them systematically sabotaged the pits so they could take the redundancy money. It’s always the middle class Lefties who claim that the working class is desperate to fucking work. There’s a whole lot of mythologised hokum spun by the Communist Party around the Jarrow marches and South Wales Miners’ libraries. And the proud working class desire for self-improvement… In his top book The Intellectual Life of the British Working Class, David Rose shows that most miners detested the communists because they were arrogant and bullying. The most taken out book from Maerdy miners’ library was not The Communist Manifesto but East Lynne, a Victorian melodrama.

TH: Can you generalize about what the miners did when the mines closed?

IB: Turn to heroin! No, get on the long term sick. They ran pubs. Many of them moved away and totally revamped their lives. After twenty five years few of them regretted. moving from the pits despite the nostalgic camaraderie.

TH: Now what about the argument that says: there is camaraderie in the workplace?

IB: Well there is, and solidarity. But people will find camaraderie in prisons or the most desperate situations you know. There is that camaraderie, but you find other ways of getting it outside the world of work. A lot of the miners found that difficult at first especially with Thatcher intent on destroying a sense of community through her “no such thing as society” speech.

TH: The Guardian is the worst for this. The comments on their blogs are by far the most mean-spirited of all the comment-makers. They’re the worst for calling for “more and better jobs”. They’re also the worst payers in Fleet Street. And it’s full of hierarchy.

IB: Well, they’re all Oxbridge, aren’t the

TH: Well, I am too! But it is Oxbridge-dominated.

IB: The editor’s daughter is on the payroll… When you see a young sprog in the Guardian, you know they’re related… Barnaby, Josh and Harry… leave it out!

TH: As an alternative to wage slavery, we want to do a “taking care of business” issue of the Idler, which will look at how to start your own small business. That is a realistic alternative. We are now running an online shop at the Idler as a micro-business.

IB: For a someone who is idle you put in a hell of a lot of hard work.

TH: As you can imagine, I’ve heard that comment a lot. Yes, we are quite productive. But at home, I work from nine to one and that’s it, really.

RRJ: If you are doing something that you enjoy, as he enjoys it, then you are idle.

IB: It’s like you said earlier, Ray: you are actually very busy.

TH: Idlers are busy! You’re more lazy in a full time job. You just sit there waiting for six o’clock to come. Then you are too tired to do much beyond go to the pub or watch telly.

IB: Do something to disengage your brain.

TH: Jobs tend to be humiliating. You spend all day being told off and then you run to the tube. Then you can’t wait for the tube journey to be over. Then you run home. What do I do now? Have a glass of wine and watch Twin Peaks.

RRJ: The magazine I did, The Roughler, that was really hard work. It was a nightmare and that was just a fanzine.

TH: Yes, it is hard putting a magazine together.

IB: The print costs have come right down. You used to go abroad to get stuff done, but you can get it done in this country now, cheap. The turnaround time is a hell of a lot quicker, too.


TH: I’ve been looking at the pre-Reformation calendar. There was more fun. Cromwell ruined it and then Charles II reopened the theatres and the maypoles went back up.

IB: Well, Charles II… The Ranters were against him

TH: When were the Ranters?

IB: Well, around the same time.

TH: But Cromwell hated the Ranters and the Diggers and the Levellers as well.

IB: Winstanley… Ranters… puritans… fornication… swearing…blasphemy – all that moment of liberation came out of nowhere.

TH: Now, do you think it is always only going to be small groups who break away in this way, like you guys, or the Ranters? Can you imagine mass liberty, or are people just too scared to take that liberty?

IB: A lot of them in jobs are doing what they want anyway…

RRJ: Everyone’s trying to be an entrepreneur all of a sudden…

TH: Yes, but take postmen as an example. I know two posties. One had a heart attack and one was off ill from stress for months. And that’s supposed to be a pleasant job.

IB: “When I get fed up I can climb higher – in time for my heart attack when I retire” – that’s an old number called “Right to Work” our band used to do.

TH: All this ingenuity…

IB: Sabotaging the production line has been a staple of worker’s fightback throughout history.

TH: Wouldn’t it be better if all that ingenuity, energy and collective action was directed towards working for ourselves?

IB: Not if it’s useless production or some chinless fuckwit fashion designer entrepreneur. And don’t get me started on fucking farmers’ fucking markets.

TH: I don’t get anywhere in persuading people near me to boycott Tesco’s… what sort of spirit do you see in people compared to the late sixties and seventies?

IB: There’s very little fightback or imagination around at the moment. We are fed a diet of Daily Mail heath scares and panics. Don’t go outside you might get swine flu. Also in the eighties if you went on a riot and weren’t nicked on the day you got away with it. Now with CCTV and telly coverage you can get nicked months or years later. No fun in that.

TH: What about Climate Camp and all the rest of it

IB: I think that’s just middle class wank turning into green careers or environmental quangos. Climate Camp is the new Cowes week.

TH: Well, what’s happened to the working class intellectuals, then?

IB: A lot of them have been bought off, writing opinion pieces like in-house bits of rough.

TH: Or they become stand-up comedians.

IB: That’s another lot – even the fucking comedians have all been to Oxbridge… Sorry to say it, Tom, but they’re all fucking at it. Everything from the protest movement to even the journos are Oxford or Cambridge educated – Tony Benn, Tariq Ali, Ken Loach…

RRJ: I interviewed Tony Benn. And I said to him, Tony, what about this story of Mrs Thatcher liking you? “Oh, that’s in the past, we’ve got to forget about the past.”

IB: I remember when Churchill died in South Wales. There were collections and some English villages raised thousands. Merthyr Tydfil raised half a crown, a couple of buttons. And some green shield stamps.

TH: But what’s wrong with a good education…

IB: Tony Benn, Ken Loach… I rest my case.

TH: I wrote a chapter in one book about how anti-war marches were a waste of time. But my liberal publishers — who work with the organization Liberty — wouldn’t print it.

IB: One of the problems with the anarchist movement is that it’s lost its libertarian impulse and its hedonism. It doesn’t vigorously oppose restrictions on liberty. We believe in free speech – opposing Griffin going on Question Time was fucking ridiculous, with people saying: “I believe in free speech but…”

TH: But a big part of the anarchist thing is to bust up racist marches and so on.

IB: Nothing wrong with a punch up. I believe Griffin can have free speech but take the physical consequences if people don’t like what he says. I used to admire Donald Soper on his stepladder at Speakers Corner taking on all comers. Top geezer. There’s a whole gamut of things… that’s what I like in the Idler, that libertarian, English anarchy, an affection for place and roots. I love Frank Newbold’s wartime posters: “It’s Your England… Fight For It” and Orwell’s English socialist patriotism. A lot of anarchists are actually just boring leftists…

TH: I like those creative things that actually add to people’s lives, rather than the far Left whingeing. Which is also, in lots of cases, just resentment. And resentment is the wrong attitude.

IB: Nothing wrong with a bit of resentment. Resentment and bitterness! The Yippees and the Dutch Provos showed you can be both bitter and funny. I can just imagine Monbiot on the train saying “don’t do that, Harry” to one of his annoying sprogs who’s annoying every other fucker in the compartment.

RRJ: At dinner, the parents will stop the conversation so their child can interrupt!

TH: We’ve been a bit guilty of that sort of thing. There’s something wrong with my generation of parents. It’s good to be ignored.

IB: People give their kids ridiculous choices. Shut up and eat it! Would you like shallots? No fucking way.

RRJ: If their mother and father are going out, the children should know they’ve got to behave…

TH: Some kind of horrible progressive thing has happened. The word “parenting” is a new word.

IB: They’re treated as young adults. But they’re not and you need to take decisions for them.

TH: State schools are pretty awful because they have been subjected to successive progressive ideologies. That’s why at home we are rebelling by learning Latin, by rote. So we are learning amo, amas, amat, amamus, amatis, amant.

IB: Amabo, amabis, amabit, amabimus, amabitis, amabunt.

TH: The future simple! You remember it. You were probably taught well.

IB: I did O level Latin. It’s so easy to learn.

TH: That’s why you have a good brain.

IB: Because of the Latin?

TH: Someone like Boris Johnson did classics at Oxford. He has that bluff exterior but he is a serious guy.

IB: There was a story in the paper this morning that a woman was suing her boss for sexual harassment at work, and he had sent her a rude poem by Catullus in Latin He claimed that she couldn’t possibly have known Latin, but she did!

TH: The old ways

IB: The old ways! I went to visit a kid at Summerhill School once.

TH: How did you find it?

IB: Oh, fucking awful. Half of them are Japanese, strangely enough, and there was a big row about stabbing a pet rabbit… They were having a debate about poor dead bunny but the young kids don’t know what to think… what are your views on stabbing a rabbit to death, aged three?

RRJ: Piers Thompson [a friend with kids] said to me, which camp do you think we fall into, Ray? I said, there are two camps. Either you tell your kids what to do, or you ask them what they want to do. If you tell them what to do, that’s tough love. If you ask them, then you’re a twat.

IB: On the train Jane, my partner, has no patience with middle class twats letting their kids run amok… “Stop these children coming up and pawing me… Harry, Harriet and Josh… you’re going to get thumped in a minute.” She got off to a bad start, because their mater was reading the Tatler. Because she was reading Tatler, she thought everyone else had to look after her kids. After some strong words from Jane, the woman called the police… everyone was craning their necks – class war on the 5.20 outta Paddington!

TH: This new attitude makes having children doubly more difficult than it was before. The men are feeling emasculated because the women ask for so much help, and naturally enough turn to the nearest person around. There’s not enough help from the wider family group.

IB: Also other people used to intervene with your kids. Children are indoors much more these days. The computer games but also the fear… parents read the Daily Mail horror stories

TH: Which are very rare instances.

IB: The local papers like the Hackney Gazette are full of it…

TH: Even where we are, the Mums are frightened. They say: “You can’t be too careful these days.” Although it may be changing: I just came back from a conference of teachers and social workers in Scotland and the theme there was that we have become too “risk-averse” as the jargon has it.

IB: I can remember hitch-hiking – no one does that now. So, Tom, you mix with a broad church of people, then? Social workers, Women’s Institute. A life of ludic pleasure.

TH: And hard graft.

IB: It’s hard work being playful all day. Don’t you think the Idler will be sucked into the corporations and you’ll be bought out and take the money and run off to Alex James’s organic farm? It’s inevitable…

TH: I think it would have happened by now. We have been doing it for seventeen years.

RRJ: When I get the dole now, they ask me what do I do, and I take up old copies of the magazine, and I say, can I use that computer, and they say, yeah, type this in, and I show them my TV station, Roughler TV. Now, why don’t they jump up and down and say, look at this bloke, he’s actually doing something! Instead of saying, there’s a job in this factory.

TH: I was on the dole when I started the Idler, round here, and they did send me on a sort of dolies’ business training course for a week.

IB: You were on the dole and they send you on a course to produce the Idler!

TH: Ha! But it’s kind of unrealistic because they are asking these seventeen year-old dolies to produce a business plan. There was the Enterprise Allowance Scheme. Can we not though find simple ways of working, which is making things and selling them? Women can make things at home.

IB: You want women staying at home?

TH: That’s surely better than working at Asda, to have your own small business.

IB: What about the camaraderie and the saucy banter?

TH: I’d rather be at home making jam with a couple of friends than being bossed around by an idiot at Asda.

IB: Women at home… cottage industry… I’m going misty eyed.

TH: The Women’s Institute is coming back among young people. There are art students at places like Goldsmiths who are starting their own Women’s Institute branches. It’s creative.

IB: You really do see the good in everything.

TH: It is a good thing, though!

IB: Those organisations have always been around. The Women’s Institute have been making jam at home for years, but you’re saying it’s a new trend.

TH: No, I’m saying that I’m into the old ways.

IB: The old ways!

TH: It’s the old ways that politicians hate. They don’t have a sense of history, Left or Right. They are all Whiggish.

IB: Or they make up versions of the old ways. … myths.

TH: The yeomanry. Old-fashioned Tories… You must have found with Class War, it made people realize that they were not alone.

IB: Oh yeah. We would express the wish that the Queen Mother would die of cancer. And you would get an enormous postbag with people agreeing.

TH: I think the over 65s are more radical than the young ones. How old are you two?

RRJ: I’m 58.

IB: 62. We know the old ways. How old are you?

TH: Me? 41.

IB: Ohhh! And he talks of the old ways!

TH: Well, why do you think I’ve brought you together? So I can pay my respects and sit at your feet.

Ian gives me the last four issues of Class War and also a pamphlet written by Tom Vague about the radical history of Notting Hill. Ian asks me, teasingly, whether I was in the Bullingdon Club when at Cambridge. No, I say. I was playing in hardcore punk bands and doing fanzines. Finally, we discuss schools.

TH: I went to Westminster.

IB: School?

TH: Yes.

IB: Fucking hell. They’re all the same, Ray!


Further Thoughts:

Tom Hodgkinson (born 1968) is a British writer and the editor of The Idler, which he established in 1993 with his friend Gavin Pretor-Pinney. His philosophy, in his published books and articles, is of a relaxed approach to life, enjoying it as it comes rather than toiling for an imagined better future. His philosophy of the Idle Parent is very much in tune with Carl Honore’s Slow parenting, although with a more light-hearted self interest in drinking and sex.

Hodgkinson was born in New Castle, England, and educated at Westminster School and Jesus College, Cambridge. He currently lives in North Devon.

Hodgkinson has contributed articles to The Sunday Telegraph, The Guardian and The Sunday Times as well as being the author of the Idler spin-offs, How To Be Idle, How To Be Free and The Idle Parent. In 2006 he created National Unawareness Day, to be celebrated on 1 November.

I have a problem with the educated Middle Class, coming along and telling us how life should be from the privilege positions, life as an unemployed person is a struggle The privileges i have are not with out the odd moments in prison, time in lunatic asylums. I dream of the day i can move on from the history reputation, often due to lies, rumors told by The Middle Class, Tom Hodgkinson relaxed approach to life, he has that privilege.

For some of us toiling for an imagined better future is not a Utopian ideal, it a realisation that a world based on class and privilege is one where there is no eqalibiam, The Middle Class being the problem, not the government? For some that’s a boring (and in practice, almost always hypocritical) Old Left waste of space. Blame the Kulaks for all the world’s problems, etc. Yes one judging an entire, diverse socio-economic group on the basis of some tired old ideological slogan.

This comes from life, the privileges i have today come from the everyday struggle of life, often being condoned by The Middle Class and judged by them for the mistakes i have made, i have forgiven the care staff who beat me, locked me in rooms, I can even move on from The Beatings of The Prison Staff, but it will take a lot more for me to forgive the Middle Class and the way they have and continue to trespass upon The Working Class.

In the coming months we are going to face attack from The Current Government, ill shall never forgive the hypocrites who told The Working Class to vote Labour in 1997 and no one has put this better

Then thebristolblogger August 7, 2010 here ( http://ianbone.wordpress.com)

Why as an anarchist would I want to join a, basically, socialist campaign to defend the state wholesale?

I couldn’t give toss about the British Film Council for starters. And remember, this campaign will also defend six-figure salaries for doctors, head teachers, top coppers, the privatising klepto-bureaucrat class and all the other tossers directly responsible for dominating our lives.

Presumably once I’ve successfully “defended” these tossers they’re get on with the job of fucking up my life again? Defending services and the money that go direct to the working class makes some sense. a wholesale campaign to defend the state is bollocks and just sows the seeds of our continuing oppression.

I have earned my right to be unemployed and shall defend it with all my being, i need not the likes of Tom Hodgkinson, telling me how my shit is, otherwise i do not disagree with a word in this article and ill shall be publishing copy’s to give out for free, but we need to rember the real fight back is one where there are no Middle Class involved there the emany of our class not the libertarian of our class. That task is for The Working Class alone..

underclassrising.net

Comments

Hide the following 15 comments

I need to work, people on wellfare are depending on me.

15.08.2010 14:18

Stop all benefits and pay for your own food. A bunch of excuses to sit in the pub all day is what this is about. Should go back to the 70s, stop benefits in 4 weeks and fuck em

real working class


re I need to work, people on wellfare are depending on me.

15.08.2010 14:33

Fair enough if you need to work depending on you etc, but please on 90 pounds a week i could not even sit in the pub all day even if i wanted, no you did not read this article in the whole, instead you just made the same old crass assumptions and repeat the same old bullshit, lets look at things in context instead of repeating the same old Middle Class lies/misinformation/bullshit the only reason this happens is to keep there social status in place.

THEM SCROUNGERS……..DOING A NECESSARY JOB

It’s an argument I’ve put in the latest issue of THE IDLER but I’ll restate it simply here. The capitalist economic system here in Britain currently requires there to be approx. 2 million unemployed. So what’s the problem letting those people who want to be unemployed and exist on that income be the 2 million unemployed rather than those who will be stressed by it, have heart attacks and ulcers, want more money and generally dislike being unemployed? I rest my case.

Ian Bone..

underclassrising.net


a different viewpoint

15.08.2010 14:58

Your getting £90 a week for doing nothing. The rest of us work to get that £90. Doesn't sound a very fair system to me. Sounds very unfair - like one person is exploiting the hard work of others.

To then moan that you want more is even worse. This is like going up to someone in the street and saying "Can i have some of your money?" And then saying it is not enough.

To be working class, you need to be working to appreciate what it means. You are a plastic working class, a fake

real working class


psh

15.08.2010 20:07

"Real" working class - You mightn't have noticed, but there's been a bit of a problem with the economy recently. It got in some of the newspapers, did you hear about it?

"real" working class


Bone Idle 4 sure

15.08.2010 20:12

Classic track, I have cheating the system, I been at it all my life, but I aint sitting around in no pub I got my shit to get on with. If you could have just one tiny weeny percent of all the mafia money that is laundered through oh so well to do establishments in the city of London, beer would be free nationwide.
Anyone remember off shore banking business by the members. I think they also did one on police corruption.

The Drones !!


oh really

15.08.2010 20:44

@ "Real" working class - You mightn't have noticed, but there's been a bit of a problem with the economy recently. It got in some of the newspapers, did you hear about it?

I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to Ian Bone and Ray Jones who have spent all their lives avoiding getting a job and "working hard" to stay on the dole and out of employment. Read the article numbnuts. If you can't find a job then perhaps you should of studied harder at school. I know people who have quit their jobs and found another no problem. If they can do it, anyone can.

15.08.2010 20:12
@ The Drones. Classic track, I have cheating the system, I been at it all my life, but I aint sitting around in no pub I got my shit to get on with. If you could have just one tiny weeny percent of all the mafia money that is laundered through oh so well to do establishments in the city of London, beer would be free nationwide.
Anyone remember off shore banking business by the members. I think they also did one on police corruption.

So what exactly is the difference between you and the corrupt bankers then? You both cheat the system all yours lives for self profit at the expense of others who pay your way through exploitation. The only different is the scale, the big boys are just more adept at it. I can imagine that given the opportunity to expand your £90 a week to £9000 a week wouldn't change your attitude one bit. Same story, same scum, different circumstances.

real working class


work aviodance

15.08.2010 21:51

Unfortunatley, we do all need to play a productive role in society. While I deeply disagree with wage slavery etc, the problem is not work itself, but how that work is managed and overseen in a capitalist system. Under any social system, work is necassary for the production of food, houses services etc etc. What we need to do is alter the way that work is mangaged, changing from a system of profits and wage slavery to a system of workers control of workplaces, and comunity control of neigbourhoods. Unfortunatley, all that radicals are doing by 'witholding their labour' is distancing themselves from the very people they need to be making links with, the people who have the power to change society, the workers.
I'm all for stealing from the boss, and slacking off from many of the menial tasks associated with the illogical and arbitrary capitalist labour system, but the fact remains that work does, and will always need to be done.
In reality, the workplace is the frontline in the battle against capitalism, and I find it confusing that so many anarchists willingly remove themselves from that struggle. The power can mend their windows, and even relinquish the odd squatted system. What they cannot combat is a militant and organised workforce taking control of production.
I don't judge anyone for being on the dole, I was long trem unemployed myself, but I do think that the idea that work refusal is a tactic for change is misguided.
And as regards 'right to work' being bollocks - many people do want to work (I enjoy many aspects of my job, and would hate to lose it, and also see it as socially important), and many have no choice, havinh kids to raise, rent to pay etc, and rhetoric about how we don't want or need to work is of little comfort to them.
The best way to create a society in which work is fun, creative, less strenuous and self managed is by doing all we can to radicalize workers to create such a society, and unfortunatley, we can't do that from the outside.

(A) Sab


It's not benefits that are outrageous, it's the cuts

16.08.2010 07:31

The Guardian reports on attacks on people who have been on disability benefits for 10 years or more.

Employment Minister Chris Grayling described the figures as "outrageous" and promised action to get people off benefits and back into work.

There is a shocking lack of acknowledgement or awareness that if someone has been on disability benefits for 10 years are probably pretty ill, have significant impairments, or face massive barriers.

"Thousands of people who have simply been cast aside by a welfare system that does nothing but put them in a queue for benefits and then forgets about them.

"Well those days are over. We will no longer accept a system which writes people off at a drop of the hat and expects the taxpayer to foot the bill."

With statements like that, they appear to be trying to cloak their attacks in the guise of concern for the benefit recipients, but it is a thinly disguised threat where the biggest concern is clearly the 'taxpayers footing the bill'.

It shows a complete lack of comprehension of the reality of the day to day lives of those who have been on long-term sickness benefits, and of why people are in this situation. There are many things the government could do to improve disabled people's lives and, yes, their chances of eventually getting back to work, but cutting off benefits helps no-one.

To put the £4.2 billion in context, we also know that £16 billion worth of benefits go unclaimed every year.

Me


The true spirit of Anarchy

16.08.2010 11:46

The true spirit of Anarchy has lost ground to people who are actually just lefties in libertarian clothing. I was wrong to think that the old-school Anarchists could drop their sectarianism and work to promote the beautiful idea. It's time for something completely new.

Well I suppose I first got involved in radical politics as a matter of course, during the late 1960s when it was a part of the culture. The counterculture, as we called it then, was very eclectic and all embracing. It included fashions of dress, styles of music, philosophical positions, and, inevitably, political positions. And although there would be various political leanings coming to the fore from time to time, I suppose that the overall consensus political standpoint was probably an anarchist one. Although probably back in those days, when I was a very young teenager, I didn’t necessarily put it into those terms. Authors on Anarchism - an Interview with Alan Moore  http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=2007alan-moore-interview


underclassrising.net


re real working class

16.08.2010 13:15

Blimey your what are you on, I guess if at some stage you were to climb down from your high we could maybe discuss the matter over a pint or two. Where is your sense of humour M8 ?
The title real working class is a bit hard to fathom, I am not sure if they really exist, just by really understanding the situation makes you one step in front of the real hard right racist bigots, like almost middle class. It's like the poison factory is gonna close down but the bosses and trade unions whip up a public protest cos all the people from the town work there, even though life expectancy is well below the national average. half of them are brown bread before they are fifty. What are you fighting for the right to be a slave and die of some horrible illness ? or perhaps boredom. come on get into 'em !!

Bone idle 4 sure


thanks, some questions

16.08.2010 17:28

If everyone worked in a poison factory and had a reduced life expectancy, then I might start to see your point. But that simply isn't even remotely true. You have neglected to take into account that people have choices.

But there are opposing points to reflect on:
1) Everyone doesn't work in a poison factory.
2) People who work in a poison factory arent forced to work in one. They can resign and do another job.
3) Many people who are on the dole and got nothing to do suffer from depression. So it is easy to argue that the dole reduces people's life expectancy and sould be avoided. Less money = worse diet aswell, so I can't see the dole being a good career choice.


I'd appreciate more light on your way of thinking and would greatly appreciate it if you could answer these questions. Thanks.
a) Your argument revolves around you not liking work / not thinking it is good for your health. Perhaps you just did jobs that you didn't like? Why didn't you work towards a job you do like?
b) Given the "I sat and read the sun all day and looked at the internet in my job and was bored" attitude. Why didn't you use that time to learn a new set of skills so you could find a job with better pay and that was more interesting?
c) If you choose not to work (you both seem to actively avoid work) and assuming that the government stopped paying our benefits, then who is going to put food in your bellies and keep you warm in the winter?
d) If were were in a plane crash and landed on a desert island with 9 other people and had to work together to survive. Would you pull you weight and do jobs that were boring and that you didn't like or would you just sit there with your hand out?

real working class


Anarchismo

17.08.2010 00:18

I've been unemployed since 2004. I'm in my sixth year of living off the state. The first year made me ill, but then wore off because I'm a stubborn son of a bitch. So it should be easy for people to tell me I'm a scrounger and a burden to 'ordinary hard-working tax payers'.

But this isn't ordinary people talking, this is the state talking. The same state that lives for free off the proceeds of the hard work of others.

This is the state that is a scrounger and a free-loader that sits with its hand out never having done a days work in its entire fucking life.

For me the last five years hasn't been at all negative because despite not 'working' I have been tremendously busy. Far more busy than I have ever been while working to feed the idle state through its tax demands. I am happier, more complete, less stressed, stronger and more resilient. I have a clarity about my thinking which I have never experienced before. In short, I am liberated.

I could go back to 'work' tomorrow but if I did, my health would begin to deteriorate and in the not to distant future I would become ill, weak, depressed and unable to think clearly. All of the qualities that the state needs to be able to reduce me to a sick, intimidated, anti-social, withdrawn benefit dependent.

The kind of benefit dependent that the 'working class' don't want to become and therefore 'work' to avoid!

For me, 'unemployment' is a catchphrase, it only means something when you attach it to the state. Without the state the term is meaningless. The word 'employment' is a counter phrase that again is meaningless without the state. For me, only the word 'activity' has any meaning. Activity can mean working or not working, idleness or labor, action or inaction. Each of these states is legitimate as each are tremendously important for a full, rich and rewarding existance.

Allowing our lives to be governed by the bi-polar demands of a state that wants it all, all of the time, is unhealthy, foolish and counter productive. It was born in a time where the people accepted that its authority could be violent, brutal and strict in the name of enforcement of control by monarchs and oligarch's. Our modern 'Capitalist State' is now a parent that people accept for their own good in the pursuit of easy wealth. What used to be 'heresy' and 'piety' are now 'unemployment' and 'employment'.

Its all a trick to keep people feeding the grand free-loader.

I like this article, its ordinary, normal and completely reasonable. If it seems odd, that's the voice of the capitalist state setting up camp in your head!

Michael F


Michael F

17.08.2010 00:52

I guess i'm really struggling with this, because it just doesnt make any sense to me.

For instance, if everyone was unemployed and all benefits, where would we get our food, fuel and clothing from? I am sure that this situation is impossible, so the next thought is why should some people have to work to support those that don't work? Who gets off their ass and makes dinner and who sits around and soap dodge. Should the soap dodger have the same amount of food as the working working-class person, or should they just get the leftover scraps?

Your argument revolve around how that isn't me talking, it is the state talking.
I'm sorry, but it is me talking - not the state. I know if I'm talking or not!
And i can guarantee that most working working-class people feel the same way.

Also, I'm surprised that you think you would be ill if you started work again. I think everyone has jobs that they dislike at some point. But just move on and find one you do like. Would you say that it is impossible for you to work. I mean, what if you were facing starvation? Would you miraculous recover and manager to suddenly work again? If there were no benefits, do you think you would suddenly get better? Would this be the cure to your ailment?

I really like my job. It has ups and downs like anything in life, but I certainly don't feel miserable doing it by any stretch. It also gives me plenty of money to persue the things i want in life. Each to their own I suppose. I just find it laughable that the unemployed try to demand a pay rise lol! Interested in your thoughts

real working class


Yes, very interesting subject.

17.08.2010 14:43

"I really like my job. It has ups and downs like anything in life, but I certainly don't feel miserable doing it by any stretch. It also gives me plenty of money to persue the things i want in life. Each to their own I suppose. I just find it laughable that the unemployed try to demand a pay rise lol! Interested in your thoughts"

The activity that I do is an extension of a job I used to have. Which in turn came from a hobby I pursued for most of my life. When I worked (PAYE) the experience left me ill. As a hobby I loved it and as an activity I loved it. As 'work' I nearly lost the entire thing along with my state of mind.

Not everybody has had the same experience of course but I did. So do plenty of others. I am only liberated and really free now because i have taken the step of abandoning everything I have been told is good for me by the state that is supposed to be concerned with my welfare. Had I have continued with following its advice, I would be much older, more haggard, more unhappy, depressed, ill, stressed, difficult to live with, more stupid, foolish and on it goes. I would have been resentful that I could not be a successful member of society consuming and using products and services. I would have blamed myself for failures which I would have convinced myself were my own. I would have ended my life a shadow of the man I could have been. I'd be morose and belligerent, cynical and mean.

But it wouldn't have been me, it would have been my stupidity in not recognizing that my life is far too valuable to surrender to and sacrifice to something that has no interest in my welfare unless I do exactly as it strictly tells me. The state is only happy if your profitable and can fund its lifestyle of corruption and free-loaders. If you are not profitable, well you have to be pasty, ill looking, degenerate, unattractive to the opposite sex, in need of help, a burden, a weakling that needs to be kept alive only for moral reasons, and then held up as an example for others, lest they allow themselves to make the same mistake, of turning their backs on the state and ending the funding that the sate cannot survive without.

You ask a question about what would happen if we were all 'unemployed'?

Well, like you, a great many people would simply carry on. A doctor doesn't work purely because he's thinking of the money, he's working because he has a higher calling. Most of the activity that people are involved with that is low-level stuff like medical health care, food production, welfare is activity that people do because they want to not because they have too.

Working for a factory producing pointless disposable goods is not the same as saving somebodies life and combating disease.

Tell me how many people are happy with sitting around all day smoking and drinking and how many seem industrious and inclined toward being busy? There are always those who will free-load off the good activity of others, we know this because the state exists. If it exists, they MUST be there.

Who feeds the 'unemployed', Well I grow my own vegetables so I can feed myself. So do a great many other people who are think the state is best viewed at a distance. I do this because I understand that filling my body with industrially produced food-stuffs will also make me ill. I grow my own because i like it, not because i have to.

If the 'just in time' food system broke down in the UK, it would be these vegetable growers who would save the day. The 'workers' would suddenly find themselves helpless and abandoned, despite their long-time obedience. The state wouldn't lift a finger to help. It just wouldn't really care. It would simply default down to keeping control of what little funds are left available, and continue to keep those who still have money left available paying its income. In a disaster, the poor are always the first to be abandoned. This isn't the way the world works, it is the state moving its fat, ugly body to a new position to get comfortable once again.

In the fourteenth and seventeenth century in the UK, plague hit hard and most of the population was lost. When it hit, the state did nothing at all to help. Most of those who had been loyal to the state, simply ran away. Entire families were locked into their houses with the infected and, as a result, the death toll rocketed. In those two episodes, the state did little more than keep a record of the deaths. There was no attempt whatsoever to actually help. There were no mercy missions, no humanitarian panic as the state realised that the people were in danger. Nothing, Just the quiet scribbling of quill pens.

Had plague accounted for the entire population, the state would have left nothing behind it except its finances, written in ink, on paper.

The state is interested only as long as you have the money to fund its lifestyle. When that money is gone, it will walk away from you and leave you to die. There is nothing you can do, but abandon it before its too late.

It is all it deserves.

Michael F


Michael F

17.08.2010 22:34

Many thanks for your thoughtful post. Sorry if I'm so brief here!

Broadly, I understand your reasoning. It sounds like you are actually self-employed / self sufficient to me rather than unemployed. I guess i term 'unemployed' as someone who is not working but needs an income to eat and live with, so becomes a claimant of benefits.

I don't think anyone would begrudge your lifestyle choice. You have made that choice and do not need a crutch off the state to keep it then nice one. Not a problem

If however, you are saying you have made those choices but, in order to achieve it you are using the state benefit crutch then that would be a different matter. You would be getting benefits (longer life, happiness etc) at the expense of others which is wrong.


"Well, like you, a great many people would simply carry on. A doctor doesn't work purely because he's thinking of the money, he's working because he has a higher calling. Most of the activity that people are involved with that is low-level stuff like medical health care, food production, welfare is activity that people do because they want to not because they have too."

Im sure that is true of everyone. For instance, would a binman still empty the bins rather than stay in bed? I doubt it. Then, without binmen, would everyone bother getting rid of their rubbish responsible? I doubt it. So we would have refuse everywhere and a plague of rats to deal with.

"Working for a factory producing pointless disposable goods is not the same as saving somebodies life and combating disease."

People work in factories at really boring jobs making things like essential medical supplies, medical drugs, lifesaving equipment, pace makers etc. I doubt that working in a bandage factory is very interesting, but we still need bandages.

Your last points about the state.......
I don't like the state.... its takes my money off me and gives it to people who don't work. However it is still a necessary evil. If it wasn't for the state, I wouldn't give any of my belongings to people who didn't lift a finger. So they would probably end up starving. Its unfair that I have to do that, but the state is like a big sister ensuring what is right is done.

Without somekind of overseeing system, there would be anarchy. Each person looking after their own and the vulnerable left to fend for themselves. An example is Somalia, they don't have an operating government - is it a picture of social fairness. Hardly. Yet the UK with its "evil" state, for all its faults, has better average conditions for its population. I think our system works far better than their system.

some more


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Sheffield Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Sheffield [navigation.actions2016]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2015]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

Sheffield Actions 2013

G8 2013

Sheffield Actions 2012

Workfare

Sheffield Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

Sheffield Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Sheffield Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Sheffield Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Sheffield Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Sheffield Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Sheffield Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Sheffield Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Sheffield Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech