Skip Navigation | Sheffield IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

UK Indymedia UK Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia

Local Government Pensions - Sell Out Expected

Chris | 28.03.2006 20:49 | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements | Sheffield

Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, made it clear in an interview this morning on the Today Programme on Radio 4 that the leadership of the unions would be prepared to accept a deal like the one the civil service unions have agreed — a deal which protects the terms and conditions of existing employees but also allows new employees to be taken on under worse conditions. This is a strategy that will bring grief in the medium term — how will the unions get support from their whole membership to defend the pension agreements of the old employees when they are in a miniority? Why would new employees, who pensions rights would have been sold out even before they started their jobs, strike in defence of the conditions of the old employees when the government comes back for more cuts in conditions?


Some extracts from the interview with Dave Prentis:

"The government itself has reached agreements with civil servants, with teachers, with health workers, with police officers that says that as we move to new schemes which are more viable for the future and a retirement age of 65 the existing pension contracts of existing workers will be honoured. That decision was reached in cabinet, it has been denied to everybody within the Local Government Pension Scheme and they have been told that they have two or three years of protection then everybody works that extra five years."

"All we are asking for is that we have the same type of protection as that been agreed by the cabinet and then we will talk about a new scheme which is affordable, which is viable, which takes account of longevity because we want our people in the future in the next thirty to forty to have pensions when they retire."

"The best public sector employers what they do is they close their scheme to existing people and then they come forwards with a new scheme, and that really is all we are asking for..."

"75% of this scheme is women, their average pension is only £31 a week and they have been told that if they want to continue to retire at 60 that will have to reduce by a third. Now all we are saying is let us negotiate a protection arrangement for them, honour their pension contract and we will negotiate a new scheme which takes account of the different circumstances we are in."

You can listen to the whole interview on the BBC web site:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today3_strike_20060328.ram

Chris

Additions

Unison United Left Pension Statment

29.03.2006 08:46

This statment was put out last year after the leadership of UNISON agreed to a two-tier pension system in the NHS and it is reposted from LabourNet:



Pensions: UNISON United Left statement
Report by UUL
Published: 30/10/05

Please read the statement below from members of the UUL steering committee.
Pensions: no victory yet

Many UNISON members may believe that the public sector unions secured a major victory on Tuesday 18 October with the announcement of a “framework agreement” that safeguarded the position of workers already in the schemes covering civil servants, healthworkers and teachers. After all, most of the press lamented the Government’s failure to increase the basic retirement age to 65, while the head of the Confederation of British Industry was enraged by the supposed “capitulation” to the unions.

The UNISON United Left believes, however, that the “Economist” was closer to the mark in noting that Dave Prentis and other union leaders have effectively agreed to the Government’s agenda for cutting pension costs by some £13 billion over the next 50 years, albeit by other means than previously proposed. By conceding the principle of a two-tier pension scheme in the NHS, the general secretary has indicated that UNISON is willing to sign away the pension rights of future generations of workers. Not only is this approach wrong because it is fundamentally unjust to younger workers, but it also threatens the longer term future of the NHS scheme if new recruits object to the notion of “paying more for less” when it comes to a pension scheme and choose to opt out altogether. In short, there are compelling arguments against a two-tier scheme and our members in all affected service groups should get to hear them debated openly.

Crucially, of course, the Government has yet to offer the same framework agreement to those of us in the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS). While Dave Prentis has urged Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott to force the employers’ body, the Local Government Association, to negotiate within the same framework, there is no guarantee that he will do so. At present, council workers and others covered by the LGPS face a worse attack than the one the Government revoked in July in return for the suspension of the threatened strike action. In the light of last week’s developments there is a far greater risk that those of us in the LGPS will confront the demands for an immediate increase in the retirement age and higher employee contributions in isolation. Effectively, the “framework agreement” undermines the unprecedented unity among public sector unions that brought the Government to the negotiating table in the first place.

The United Left believes that our leadership’s actions this past week breached the spirit and, arguably, the letter of resolutions overwhelmingly adopted earlier this year. The local government conference, for instance, categorically rejected “any suggestion of ‘compromise agreements’ on this matter” and also agreed to oppose “increasing to 65 the age of entitlement to an unreduced pension”. This position was “non-negotiable” and made no mention of future workers not yet in the scheme.

There are clearly important lessons issues to be debated over coming weeks, not least about the transparency of the negotiations with Alan Johnson and the Government, the absence of lay member participation in the recent talks and effective control over our full-time officials. In the meantime, the United Left believes that there must be:

* A genuine ballot on the “framework agreement” in the Health Service, with branch meetings to give the opportunity to put the case against two-tier schemes

* A campaign to inform members in all service groups of the dangers of a two-tier scheme, and

* A clear call from the Service Group Executive for an immediate move to ballot members in the LGPS-linked employers for strike action if the employers don’t back down by early November.

We also call on the Health Service Group Executive to defer any recommendation about the “framework agreement” at least until such an offer also extends to those covered by the LGPS.

Finally, the United Left believes it is essential to maintain the linkages we have established at a regional and local level between a range of public sector trade unions in defence of the pension schemes. In the coming period we should be seeking to work closely with fellow trade unionists in the FBU, whose own scheme is similarly unprotected by the “framework agreement”. Unity at the base of the unions is certain to prove essential whether for a renewed battle over pensions or if we are to ward off the threats posed by further privatisation in the NHS and the latest New Labour proposal for state-funded independent schools.

 http://www.labournet.net/ukunion/0510/pensions8.html

LabourNet


Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Who cares?

29.03.2006 10:20

Who cares whether pensions are cut or not. What use is loads and loads of money to you when you are 65 - 90 years old? And who knows whats going to happen over the next 30 years? The world as we know it might not exist by then.

Non striker


who am I?

30.03.2006 17:03

Why should I care? Will I ever get old? Where am I? Who am I? Here, here's my wallet, do help yourself Mr Minister sir.

non-thinker


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Sheffield Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Sheffield [navigation.actions2016]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2015]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

Sheffield Actions 2013

G8 2013

Sheffield Actions 2012

Workfare

Sheffield Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

Sheffield Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Sheffield Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Sheffield Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Sheffield Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Sheffield Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Sheffield Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Sheffield Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Sheffield Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech