Skip Navigation | Sheffield IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

UK Indymedia UK Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia Sheffield Indymedia

Asylum Seekers - The long walk

Pat | 09.11.2006 14:32 | Globalisation | Migration | Repression | Social Struggles | Sheffield

Destitute asylum seekers in Nottingham now have to travel to Loughborough to report -under threat of arrest if they don't.

Would you support a campaign to highlight (and hopefully overturn) this policy?

Conditions have recently, yet again, changed for the worse for asylum seekers. They used to have to report and sign at Nottm's Central Police Station. There is now a new Reporting Centre for the East Midlands in Loughborough, 22km as the crow flies from Nottingham.

They must find their own initial fares there. If they are receiving support, they can then claim their return and subsequent fares, with no guarantee that they will get them.

If they have been refused and are destitute with no income, they cannot claim their fares.

The only way that destitute asylum seekers (with poor diets and probably inadequate footwear) can get to - and from - Loughborough, is by walking.

Not only is this inhumane, it is also plainly ridiculous.
It is another attempt to make life impossible for asylum seekers.

As a protest against this new requirement, and to highlight offical abuse of asylum seekers, there has been a suggestion from Nottingham Refugee Campaign Group that we walk to Loughborough in solidarity. This walk would raise as much publicity as possible.

Maybe we'd walk all the way. Maybe only as far as is possible in a certain time. Maybe some would be there at the beginning and/or end, and others would do the whole distance.

There is also a suggestion that we contact and co-operate with groups in Derby and Leicester.

Why this email:

We want your response to this idea. It will only go ahead if there is enough support for it.


Do you think it's a good idea? (yes/no and reasons)

Would you be prepared to:

walk some of the way?

walk all of the way?

help with organising/publicity/transporting people back from Loughborough afterwards?

Any comments on a good time to do it?

Any other comments?

Please reply to  chriscookcann@yahoo.co.uk

Pat

Additions

Reckon you should challenge the Contact Management Officer

09.11.2006 18:37

Travel expenses for asylum seekers who have to report are available under Section 69 of the NIA to help people adhere to their reporting restrictions under paragraph 21 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 (temporary admission or release), paragraph 29 of that Schedule (bail pending appeal) and paragraphs 2 or 5 of Schedule 3 to that Act (release subject to restrictions pending deportation).

There is a power in 'exceptional cases' for the Contact Mangement Officer who covers a particular reporting center to provide funds for travel to other categories of person as well.

Therefore, rather than walking with Asylum Seekers the distance to the reporting center - a purely symbolic, though admirable, expression of solidarity - I'd suggest you identify the person who is the Contact Management Officer for the Loughborough reporting center and phone / fax and pressure by all means necessary the bureaucratic sum into carrying out their statutory duty to provide travel costs.

Demand that reasons for refusals of costs to be provided in writting - and think about seeking a judical review of the bastards decision-

I reproduce the guidance on travel costs below for your information

good luck

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Travel expenses - for people required to attend regular reporting events

Contact Management Policy, Process & Implementation June 2006
 http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/lawandpolicy/travelexpenses

Travel Expenses Policy
1. Introduction: Contact Management (CM) is the means by which the Immigration Service (IS) maintains contact with asylum seekers & other applicants throughout the application process.
The legal basis for requiring an applicant to report to the IS, or the police, is paragraph 21 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 (temporary admission or release), paragraph 29 of that Schedule (bail pending appeal) and paragraphs 2 or 5 of Schedule 3 to that Act (release subject to restrictions pending deportation). Section 69 of the NIA states that the Secretary of State may make a payment towards the cost of travelling expenses to enable persons to comply with reporting restrictions.
Dedicated IS Reporting Centres (RCs) have been established to support contact management objectives. There are currently eleven RCs – four in London, and one each at Folkestone, Solihull, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, North Shields and Glasgow. Additional CM coverage is supplied by locating IS staff in police stations. Payment of travelling expenses will be introduced by a phased rollout to RCs with payments for reporting to police stations being introduced at a later date.
Where a subject reports to a reporting centre or IS staffed police station that has not yet commenced payment of travelling expenses and is experiencing difficulties in reporting, consideration will be given on a case by case basis to amending his or her reporting regime until such time as payment of travelling expenses commences. Representations should be made to the immigration office responsible for the reporting regime.
All queries relating to this policy should be referred to UKIS Contact Management Policy, Process & Implementation team.

2.1 Criteria: Assistance to meet the cost of travel will only be payable to subjects required to regularly report as part of their conditions of temporary admission / release. Travelling expenses will not be paid under this provision where people are directed to attend for an interview in connection with their immigration status or for other matters, unless such events are included within an existing reporting regime.

Travelling expenses will only be payable from the date the process is rolled out at specific reporting centres. No consideration will be given to any retrospective payments for reporting.
Applications for travel expenses must be made in person at a reporting centre. Where an application is approved at a reporting centre subjects will receive a travel ticket for their journey home and for their next reporting event.

2.2 Reporting Distances: Subjects living less than 3 miles from the reporting centre will not be eligible to receive help with travelling expenses except in cases of exceptional need.
The 3 miles will be calculated as a radius from the reporting centre.
2.3 Reporting Centre Applications: Asylum Seekers living 3 miles or more from their reporting centre who receive NASS support under S95 or S4 are eligible to receive help with travel expenses for reporting.

2.4 Restrictions: Where an application has been approved, payment will only be made for the person required to report. Payment for other persons to accompany the subject will be considered under the exceptional needs provisions.

2.5 Exceptional Needs: Where a subject does not have automatic entitlement to travel expenses or has automatic entitlement but has additional requirements a claim for exceptional need can be made.

Exceptional need claims will be considered centrally by CMPPI.
Where refused, subjects will be advised in writing; where granted, subjects will be advised in writing, outlining where appropriate the length of time the payments will continue and will also be provided with a travel ticket in order for them to meet their next reporting event.

When exceptional need is granted it will only be from the date the claim was decided on; no provision will be made for retrospective payment of travelling expenses in exceptional needs cases.
2.6 Review: When an exceptional need claim is refused the subject will have the right of review against the decision. The request for review will be considered by CMPPI. If then granted on review this will be from the date of the review decision; no provision will be made for retrospective payment of travelling expenses. If exceptional need is refused the subject will have no further right of review.

2.7 Lost and Stolen Tickets: Tickets that are reported lost or stolen will only be replaced in exceptional circumstances as part of the exceptional needs provisions.

3. Payments
3.1 Claiming: Subjects entitled to travel expenses will receive assistance towards the cost of travel on request.

Subjects not entitled when requesting assistance will receive a leaflet outlining the policy for travelling expenses. The leaflet will contain information and a claim form on how to claim travelling expenses due
to exceptional needs.
3.2 Non cash payments: All costs for travelling provided to subjects will only be in the form of travel tickets made valid for the subjects next reporting event. Under no circumstances will assistance for the cost of travel be made in cash. Tickets will be solely for use on public transport covered by a local Passenger Transport Executive.

--

one of noborders


Comments

Display the following 4 comments

  1. Refugee Campaign Group Meeting — pat
  2. re: challenge the Contact Management Officer — p
  3. Expenses only available to asylum seekers receiving NASS — C
  4. TCAR - Saturday, 19th May 2007 - National Day of Action — Citizen Sputnik

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Sheffield Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Sheffield [navigation.actions2016]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2015]

Sheffield [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

Sheffield Actions 2013

G8 2013

Sheffield Actions 2012

Workfare

Sheffield Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

Sheffield Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Sheffield Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Sheffield Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Sheffield Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Sheffield Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Sheffield Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Sheffield Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Sheffield Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech